Skip to content
ARTICLE

Die casting vs. investment casting

4 mins

What is the difference between die casting and investment casting?

Casting is one of the oldest manufacturing techniques, dating back to 1838. While the basic casting process has not changed significantly, today's machines are more advanced and technological improvements offer several ways to produce your finished product or component. Two common and very similar processes are die casting and investment casting. Read on as we discuss the differences between the processes and explain their respective advantages and disadvantages, helping you select the right process for your next project.

The die casting process

Simply put, when die casting a component, molten metal is injected into a hardened steel die cavity. Once the metal solidifies, it is ejected from the tool and the process is repeated. The process varies slightly depending on the material selected—see hot chamber die casting and cold chamber die casting. The hardened steel mould can produce anywhere from 150,000 shots to over a million shots before requiring repair or replacement.

The investment casting process

Creating a component using the investment casting or "lost wax" process is typically more time-consuming. A wax prototype of the component is produced and repeatedly dipped into liquid ceramic. The ceramic hardens, then the wax is melted out, leaving a ceramic mould. Molten metal is then poured into the ceramic cavity formerly occupied by the wax. Once the metal solidifies, the ceramic mould is broken and removed, leaving the metal casting. The mould used to create the wax pattern can be used many times; however, the ceramic mould is broken and discarded with each component. Signicast has automated every aspect of the investment casting process, making one-week lead times possible, compared with an industry average of 8-16 weeks. 

Which process is right for my project?

No two casting projects are the same, and different projects require different solutions. Here are a few factors to consider before starting your next project, to help you select the right process for your component.

Material selection

Most die cast components are made from non-ferrous metals such as zinc, aluminium and magnesium. Investment casting can cast these metals as well as ferrous metals, including stainless steel. If you wish to use a non-ferrous material, both processes offer comparable features. However, if you require stainless steels or copper alloys, investment casting is the better option.

Annual volume

When deciding which casting process to use, consider your desired payback period for tooling costs. How many components must be produced against the cost of the tooling to "break even"? While investment casting tooling may be less expensive and suitable for lower-volume projects, die casting is ideal for larger production runs and high-volume projects.

Tolerance

With any casting process, tolerance capabilities are largely influenced by the shape of the component and the type of material used. The table below compares general linear tolerances for conventional die casting and investment casting. The Multi-Slide die casting process can achieve even tighter tolerances.

 
Dimensional tolerance comparison  
 Die castingInvestment casting
Up to 25mm+/- 0.050mm+/- 0.250mm
Up to 50mm+/- 0.075mm+/- 0.350mm
Up to 75mm+/- .0.100mm+/- 0.400mm
Up to 100mm+/- 0.125mm+/- 0.500mm
**Please allow up to 0.025mm for each additional 25mm  

Cycle time

While investment casting and die casting both produce complex components, their cycle times differ greatly. Traditional investment casting is a time-consuming process requiring considerable labour and working hours, whereas die casting can produce 3-4 shots per minute for conventional die casting and upwards of 45 shots per minute with multi-slide die casting. A die cast component can often be produced without human intervention—complete automation! 

Cost

Cycle time determines up to 60% of your final component cost, so it is no surprise that, per component, investment casting generally costs more than die casting. Its highly manual processes produce components very similar to die castings, but the cycle time is much longer. 

For high-volume casting, die casting is more cost-effective than investment casting. If you are casting only a few components or require larger sizes or stainless steel, investment casting may be the lower-cost option.

While both investment casting and die casting produce components with comparable features, where extremely high-volume manufacturing is required, the associated costs and longer cycle times can make investment casting a less suitable option, depending on your requirements and deadlines. It is best to speak with an experienced casting engineer to determine which casting process is most suitable for your next project—contact our team today!

Related Resources
DFM for Data Centres: Enabling Faster, Cooler, More Reliable Scaling
Learn how DFM helps AI data centres improve thermal performance, scalability and cost efficiency through early engineering collaboration with Dynacast.
Read the Article
Die casting vs. screw machining
Compare die casting and screw machining to identify the most cost-effective, efficient process for your precision metal component manufacturing requirements.
Read the Article
Die-cast aluminium with thin walls
Discover how thin-wall aluminium die casting reduces weight, maintains strength and improves precision for complex, high-performance engineered components.
Read the Article

Interested in starting your die casting project?

Our engineers are here to answer your questions and show you how innovative die casting technologies can revolutionise your next project.

Contact us